Excursions with Edward F. Mooney Pt. I

Just in case you missed it.

Dean Dettloff

Excursions with Edward F. Mooney

Part I: Style, Lyricism, and Lost Intimacy

This post is part of an ongoing series. Part II.Part III.

Here is the first part of my interview with Ed Mooney. I first encountered Ed’s work as I studied the philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard. Ed managed to open Kierkegaard’s work up for me in new and exciting ways, and I’ve been gobbling his articles and books ever since. As you will see, Ed’s interests extend well beyond Kierkegaard studies. I have broken the interview into three parts. Without further ado, please enjoy the following interview, where we begin by discussing questions of style, lyricism, and lost intimacy.

Dean Dettloff: You have had a broad and eclectic career, with work ranging from original poetry to studies of American writing to, of course, the life and work of Søren Kierkegaard. In all of your…

View original post 1,906 more words

A Long Decline from a Glorious Past (Davies)

Robertson Davies (from Leaven of Malice):

Life, as he conceived of it, was a long decline from a glorious past, and if a reader approaches a newspaper in that spirit, he can find much to confirm him in his belief, particularly if he has never examined any short period of the past in day-to-day detail.

Montaigne in Bordeaux!

Off in a bit to give my Montaigne/Emerson paper.  Talking about Montaigne in Bordeaux seems an arrogatory act.  My defense is that I hope only to say something that will be of use to someone, whether in a scholarly or a personal way.

Just Trees (Poem)

Just Trees (After the felling of the Toomer’s Oaks) | The War Eagle Reader.

A little poem to memorialize the Toomer’s Oaks.

Just Trees
(After the felling of the Toomer’s Oaks)

Aren’t they just trees?
–Yes, they are—they were.
–And weren’t they dying anyway?
–Yes, they were—and I am—and you are too.
Dying.  But someone killed them.
(Yes, you can kill something that is already dying.
If you doubt that, shoot someone with a terminal illness,
then plead your innocence.)
–But they were just trees.
–Yes—they were.  But all trees have a kind of dignity,
A dignity revealed in the way they call on us to contemplate them:
St. Augustine knew that, and Arthur Schopenhauer too.
And these trees, wrapped as they were in celebration,
Wrapped as they were in meaning,
Called on us more insistently than most—even demanded contemplation.
Poisoning them, destroying their roots, was an attack on meaning,
A meaning that some, wrapped in unmeaning, could not bear.
Meaning has weight.  You can crumble under it, or understand it, your call.
–Just trees.
Yes, just trees.  And these are just my students, this is just my university,
This is just my life.
–But the meaning of all these things—you just put it there, gilding and staining,
In burnt orange and blue.  It is not real.  It is a collective delusion.  Tradition
Is no mode of access to what is real.
–Of course it is, it always has been, and it always will be.  Tradition makes
Values available for appreciation, for appropriate response:
And your response is the tree’s judgment on you.  Luckily for you, they are, they were,
Just trees.